Experimenting now to see if a color heading will stay if
originally posted in color. Previously, I’ve tried to change the color after
the initial posting, which didn’t work and changing the color and pasting it looks
like that won’t work either.
Some folks have gotten a sort of gobbledy-gook or odd messages when
trying to log onto this new website. I’m still working on the forced transition
to this new web address, but for those able to access it, will now
continue. I admit to creating a rather rambling
posting of items of interest to me, so I appreciate the patience of readers who
might prefer a more coherent narrative. It seems much harder than before to post and arrange text on this new website.Hope something has not been left out or repeated,
My younger grandson, Kingston, now age 4, lives with his mother and siblings in Hawaii. I haven’t seen him in person since he was one=year=old, but have talked with him by phone since and via Facebook
Egyptian-born Wanda, now living in Vermont, whom I’ve known since I was a child, just celebrated her 105th birthday. I sent her some flowers and edible goodies for her party.
Sadly, I just learned that my cousin Roberta, living in New Mexico, has died of cancer. She was the
oldest daughter of my late father’s brother and was a little younger than me.
Both she and a younger sister came to my mother’s 90th birthday
celebration. My contemporaries and I are getting to the age of losing friends
and associates. I remember my mother, who died at age 92, going to one funeral
after another until it was her turn.
My current housemate, originally from Eritrea,
came here as a refugee during the Obama administration and is now an American
citizen. It looks like the Trump administration will be banning future refugees
from Eritrea. Thank goodness for Canada, where some of her family have now settled.
Violent crime is rare in Hawaii, but
here’s a recent example, 2-officers-killed-by-honolulu-gunman-in-fiery-tragedy/
When Martin Luther King Day rolls
around, I always remember that hot summer day, August 28, 1963, when my
late ex-husband and I stood on the edge of a huge crowd, straining to hear his
“I Have A Dream Speech,” little suspecting it would become such an iconic
occasion. There was much more security for Barack Obama’s 50-year
commemoration, which I also attended, than for the original event.
When tear gas and water hoses
are reported as having been used against King and his followers and also now in
Hong Kong, I can personally attest to their punishing effects. Yes, back in 1988
in Chile, as an election observer during the plebiscite against Pinochet,
I felt the blasts of powerful water hoses, almost knocking us over, and inhaled
the choking fumes of tear gas.
As for the shoot-down of the Iranian airliner, most
Canadians killed had come originally from Iran and still had family and
university colleagues and classmates there, so that “accident” and its original
coverup have aroused even more anger and opposition than usual against the
Iranian regime. But Trump triggered tensions by authorizing the general’s
assassination—or should I say “targeted killing”? --in the first place. Polls
show that most Americans disapproved of that move, which he may have undertaken
to distract from impeachment, but may have backfired.
Certainly, the Ukraine affair is not the only impeachable
offense that Trump has committed. Those of us who support impeachment are not
trying, as Trump’s advocates allege, to overturn the results of the 2016
election—too late for that, as way too much damage has already been done. We
just want to stop him now, stopping an illness that has ravaged our body
politic. He is a big cry baby, saying he’s being treated worse than the 9/11
attackers!
Hope the hard core of Trump supporters is finally starting to
crack, though that’s probably just wishful thinking. I heard a radio show
caller say, referring to Trump, “He’s so smart!” Most Republican Senators have
been hanging tight, especially those facing re-election. Lindsey Graham
has become Mr. Trump’s most vocal surrogate. Those facing re=election are not
going to upset their Trump-loving voters by going against him. But a few
crucial senators from less solid states, while they might not vote for removal,
might vote for hearing from more witnesses, namely Romney, Murkowski, and Collins,
so is there just one more senator who might dare to step up, perhaps someone
not running for re-election this year?
Trump is such an outrageous liar and so insanely jealous of the
esteem that Obama still enjoys that he dares, after trying repeatedly to defeat
Obamacare with blatant falsehoods (never on the merits), now says that
he himself saved coverage for pre-existing conditions! You or I would
make a better president! But Trump has been a real boon for “tell-all” book
authors who have left his inner circle. And the next president will be busy fixing
and reversing many harmful and ridiculous Trump decisions, such as his approval
of the use of more energy consuming light bulbs that he says make him look
better.
With his high-powered, high-profile legal defense team in place, Mr.
Trump now needs to exercise self-restraint for a change, keeping his mouth shut
and his trigger finger off twitter. But then his base won’t be energized. It’s
hard for him to appeal to his lowest and most reliable tier of support without
being outrageous.
Recommended is the following
article in The Atlantic, predicting that Trump’s lawyers
won’t make many legal arguments against impeachment, just repeat his accusations,
which will please him watching on TV and let Republican Senators know that they
need to shut this whole thing down ASAP.
Trump’s Impeachment Brief Is a
Howl of Rage
The
document released by the president’s lawyers reads more like the scream of a
wounded animal than a traditional legal filing.
Listening to the Senate impeachment hearings well into the night,
the extreme partisanship of the arguments, plus the solidity of Republican
senators’ votes, was discouraging. Justice Roberts admonished both sides
to show more civility. I am blown away by the logical, articulate, and
emotionally compelling arguments made by Adam Schiff, though most
listeners probably don’t really understand them all. And members of the public,
with their usually short attenti0on span, may be getting weary of impeachments
hearings, something which could rebound in Trump’s favor.
So far, Trump’s lawyers have been speaking in measured legalize,
arguing about esoteric points, like the timing and sequence of impeachment filings.
They even have argued that Mr. Trump, in the infamous July phone call to
Ukraine, said. “I’d like you to do us a favor,” not “do me a
favor.”
A few other snippets, first, the recent federal ban on cockfighting
has many Puerto Ricans vowing defiance, especially those who raise and bet on the
fighting roosters. They point out, quite rightly, that this ban was imposed on
the island without allowing local residents to weigh in, so it’s become a
rallying cry for Puerto Rican self-determination. I have become sickened personally
when watching a cock fight, actually in Mexico. One rooster kills the other
with razors strapped to his feet. It’s very bloody. The audience, nearly all male,
cheers loudly at the end and exchanges betting money. The surviving rooster
goes on to other fights until he finally is killed. I don’t care for bull
fights either, having watched a couple, one in Spain, the other in Mexico. Of
course, it’s a matter of cultural preferences and habits. I avoid eating beef
but do eat chicken. Is killing a chicken for food better than allowing a rooster
to fight to the death? In China, dogs are eaten. During World War II, my mother
served us horsemeat. When I was in the Peace Corps in Honduras, seeing animals
being killed for food practically made me a vegetarian.
Has anyone noticed that Puerto Rico, still recovering from
the hurricane 2 years ago, has been shaken by a series of earthquakes? The
Trump administration has been slow to respond, but, of course, Puerto Ricans
don’t have the vote and they wouldn’t vote for Mr Trump anyway.
Some residents of Asbestos. Tibet, where many workers are
involved in the mining of that fibrous substance, once prized and still used in
some applications, now want to change their town’s name after asbestos has
fallen out of favor.
Did you know that Tesla dealers are not permitted in the
Michigan, apparently for obvious reasons?
It is evident that viruses can sometimes pass from animals
to humans. It is thought that human AIDS may have originated that way,
maybe from people eating infected animals raw or not sufficiently cooked. Presumably
the virus would have to mutate to survive in humans. SARS and Ebola are
also considered to have originated in animals, as is apparently the case with
the new Corona virus from China, which seems to be very contagious, as
well as quickly lethal in its effects.
Certainly, desecrating Jewish graves, painting swastikas on
synagogues, and snatching yarmulkes off men’s heads are anti-Semitic acts,
but I wouldn’t put the BDS movement, opposition to West Bank settlements, or failure
to support Netanyahu in that category, as Trump apparently does. However, it
does seem like a good move for Israel to offer paid employment to some West
Bank residents, in fact, offering such gainful employment might do more for
peace than anything else.
After Trudeau and company were
caught snickering about Trump at the NATO summit, apparently Putin and Assad
also had a laugh at his expense.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/video-surfaces-of-putin-assad-trump-at-damascus
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/video-surfaces-of-putin-assad-trump-at-damascus
Perhaps UK leaders felt that giving Hong Kong back to China was the right thing to do, but certainly they might have found a pretext to hang on—too bad that didn’t happen. Of course, at the time, China seemed to be moving toward more openness, but has definitely backtracked on human rights, invoking increasing authoritarianism now under Chairman Xi, who has declared himself to be in charge indefinitely with no more term limits (except for those imposed by mortality). Bravo for Taiwan for remaining independent, but it is massively threatened by a much bigger and more heavily armed China.
Africa may encompass some “shit-hole” nations, as Mr. Trump alleges. Some do have really corrupt, cruel, and avaricious rulers. But Africa is a diverse continent ripe for development, something China is taking advantage of.
[Having met him, I feel terrible for him.] Cuba wants nine years in prison for leading dissident Ferrer, Reuters, https://www.yahoo.com/news/cuba-wants-nine-years-prison-203143895.html
Former Cuban judge launches broadside against its government for imprisoning thousands on dubious charges, https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-cuban-judge-launches-broadside-180318147.html
[Nicaraguans should have done this a long time ago, as they dd back in 1990 when I was an election observer there.]
Nicaragua's opposition unites against Ortega administration, AP, https://www.yahoo.com/news/nicaraguas-opposition-unites-against-ortega-215512994.html
Mexico says it will block migrant caravan en route to US from Honduras https://www.foxnews.com/world/mexico-block-migrant-caravan-honduras (Howewver, Mexico says it would welcome migrants who want to stay in Mexico.)
Anti-corruption mission in Honduras in precarious position, AP, https://www.yahoo.com/news/anti-corruption-mission-honduras-precarious-194417983.html
I would love to see a female president, especially after
the office was stolen from Hillary Clinton, who probably had the biggest
vote margin in US history. However, it may well be that a male candidate would
attract more swing voters. It’s a dilemma. What’s more important, beating Trump
or having a female president and can both successfully happen together? What
about a President Elizabeth Warren with a VP Corey Booker? With the Electoral
College favoring Republicans and Trump’s last victory margin so thin in swing
states, it might be safer this round to have a male candidate (but not
Buttigieg, maybe next time). The alleged dispute on this question between
Sanders and Warren is valid and both only have a chance this time, as next
time, they really will be too old, that is, too old for voters to support, not
necessarily too old to actually serve. Amazingly, Sanders’ heart attack does
seem to have affected his chances, nor does his failure to identify as a
Democrat. Biden may still be a safer bet, despite his stumbles. No one is
perfect. I would vote for any of them, Sanders, Biden, or Warren, in fact, for
anyone except Trump. But in addition to our own personal vote, we have to
mindful; of who we think will attract the most other voters.
Hillary Clinton may be right that despite his long
tenure in the Senate, Sanders doesn’t seem to have accomplished much, at
least not that we know of. He has lots of attractive ideas that have never been
tested in the real world. “Medicare for All” sounds really great, but
what would it mean and how would be get there? I also like his saying that he
would consider tearing down the border wall, depending on what that would cost.
Maybe he really did say that we shouldn’t risk putting a woman up against Trump
this round because of the great risk that Trump might then be re-elected. Even
I have wondered about that. Because of the Electoral College, we now know that the
majority vote winner may not become president. We saw that in a small way with
GW Bush and massively with Trump. Of course, if we always worry that a woman
might not win, we will never have a woman president. Trump used blatant anti-female
stereotypes against Hillary.
On the other hand, why did Hillary attack Bernie in a well-publicized
video? Why would she go so far as to say that no one likes him? Is she trying
to help Biden or what? Maybe she thinks Bernie did not give her enough support
in 2016? Bernie does not have a warm and fuzzy personality. He can be strident.
But many find Hillary unlovable too.
With the US birthrate plummeting, unless we allow more immigration,
we’re facing the same demographic slump as in Japan, China, and Europe.
Movements toward a cleaner
environment producing less waste and trash are taking hold, though with
repercussions for an economy built on obsolescence. There are now car, clothes,
and tools sharing and swapping arrangements, and experiments with circular
production that go beyond recycling to fabricate boxes and bottles to be reused
with minimal modification.
But
a different
dynamic
is in play in terms of personal health and survival. The idea is not
minimalism or saving resources, but the sky’s the limit in terms of life extension,
correction of personal traits and anomalies, and changing appearance. I participate
in Operation Smile surgeries in Honduras to correct harelip and cleft
palate, conditions people in past times just endured or learned to live with.
Now folks with sufficient financial wherewithal and personal endurance can
change their outward appearance, even their sexual and reproductive features.
Women unable to conceive can have a uterine transplant and give birth to a baby,
possibly conceived in a lab using a donated embryo. Is the day far away when
someone making a male-to-female sex change gives birth in this way? It seems
like the sky’s the limit in terms of possible medical interventions for personal
well-being and enhancements, as well as for life extension.
Might
it be possible to see abortion in the same context? A woman finds
herself unexpectedly and unhappily pregnant, so she reverses the situation with
a medical procedure couched in terms of women’s health and reproductive rights.
I would consider myself moderately progressive;-I have no problem with gay
marriage or premarital sex between consenting adults. But I oppose the death
penalty and have never understood “abortion rights” on an emotional level,
especially after adopting children and giving birth myself. I can well understand
the panic of a woman unexpectedly pregnant. I do not oppose abortion for a
fetus whose development is incompatible with life, though I’d advocate for the humane
euthanasia of such a fetus. I would
never join the “Right to Life” crowd that recently gathered in Washington, DC. mainly
because of their apparent majority support for Donald Trump, who appeared at
their rally this year. As indicated before on this blog. I’ve been searching
for a middle ground on abortion, but have found few like-minded people who
might join me, though polls show that most of the public has nuanced views, especially
about abortions done after the first trimester. However, I now understand one
argument of pro-abortion folks, namely that men and women should be equal in a
sexual encounter and since sex and unexpected pregnancy have no physical downsides
for men, abortion can help equalize risks by removing pregnancy as a risk for
women. Of course, STDs are risks for both genders.
The stock market has been on a tear, unemployment is low,
and so are taxes, though the deficit is soaring and economic inequality is on
the rise. Trump’s tax relief is partly responsible and, so far, the economy
favors Trump’s reelection.
For First Time in 26 Years, All U.S. Metros Enjoyed Income Gains https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/first-time-26-years-u-150735277.html
So, all that needs to be overcome to defeat Trump. But some
of us would accept some personal economic pain just to get rid of the guy.
Of course, the economic cycle will inevitably experience a
downturn and it will be our bad luck to have it happen during a Democratic
presidency.
I joined the first women’s march in January 2017 right after
Trump’s inauguration. Living as I do in the neighborhood, I walked over to observe Trump’s inauguration from a
safe distance and saw how thin and anemic looking the crowd was. It was so
different from Obama’s first inauguration, which I attended on a frigid
January day, squeezed in tightly among millions, including my daughter who came
out from Hawaii. I just did not have the spirit to join this year’s women’s march
because it seems to just increase political polarization, which needs to be
damped down. But here is a photo I took on the original march.
As for Meghan and Harry, she apparently has wanted to go back to her show-biz career, buoyed now by her royal fame, so Canada, another Commonwealth country, seems just a stepping stone back to Hollywood. Probably she found palace life was boring and too restrictive. She has reportedly just signed a deal with Disney, also is rumored to have visited her mother in LA. Meanwhile poor Harry initially stayed behind to deal with his grandmother, the Queen, who is not happy. It does seem that hereditary royalty of any kind—even the very popular British Crown—is an anachronism in today’s world.
As mentioned before, I am now feeling
the brunt of agism, also called ageism, as in an article in the AARP
Bulletin entitled “Ageism in the Workplace.” If misery loves company, I
certainly have experienced lots of it lately..